Le rapport aux traitements médicamenteux chez des personnes atteintes d’un cancer incurable
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À notre époque, l’expérience pharmacologique de la maladie cancéreuse est devenue d’une grande complexité. Cette étude poursuit comme objectif de mieux connaître et comprendre le rapport que des personnes affligées d’un cancer incurable entretiennent à l’égard des traitements médicamenteux. Un devis qualitatif faisant appel à une analyse de contenu par théorisation a été retenu. L’analyse de l’ensemble des récits révèle que le rapport développé par les sujets rencontrés à l’égard des traitements médicamenteux s’inscrit dans une logique de combat. Tout au long de la maladie, les sujets adoptent deux postures différentes à l’égard des médicaments. En guise de conclusion, des questions en regard de la structure des services offerts et en regard de l’intervention sont soulevées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".