MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2466333932

Ten Years of Experience in Converting Canadian Hydrographic Service Charts to a World-Based Geodetic Datum

2015· article· en· W2466333932 on OpenAlex
David Gray

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Hydrographic Review · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Geography and Cartography
Canadian institutionsCanadian Hydrographic Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeodetic datumNorth American Datum of 1927HydrographyService (business)GeographyGeodesyCartographyEconomyEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As long ago as 1975, North Americans realized that the North American Datum of 1927 (NAD 27) was becoming out-dated and that it would eventually have to be replaced by a geocentric datum. The Canadian Hydrographic Service (CHS) welcomed the idea but was also fully aware that some of its charts were not even based on NAD 27. In 1986, once the framework stations became known on the North American Datum of 1983 (equivalent to the World Geodetic System of 1984), CHS started the conversion of Canadian charts to that datum. This paper describes why the work was necessary, the means by which it was done, the difficulties encountered and overcome and the progress made to date.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.802

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it