MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2466372465 · doi:10.1080/0964704x.2015.1121700

Émigré scientists and the global turn in the history of science: A commentary on the special issue “New Perspectives on Forced Migration in the History of Twentieth-Century Neuroscience”

2016· letter· en· W2466372465 on OpenAlexaff
Delia Gavrus

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the History of the Neurosciences · 2016
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroscienceHistory of scienceCognitive sciencePsychologyEpistemologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The articles in this special issue of the Journal of the History of the Neurosciences explore the historical realities of the forced migration of physicians and scientists who worked in the middle ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.036
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0080.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the History of the NeurosciencesSame topicNeurology and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207