Elements of mobility as predictors of survival in elderly patients with dementia: findings from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to identify elements of mobility that predict survival in elderly people with dementia, we conducted a two-year follow-up of a cohort of dementia subjects from the population-based Canadian Study of Health and Aging. There were 749 prevalent cases of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 208 prevalent cases of vascular dementia. Elements of mobility that predicted death during the two-year follow-up period included difficulty in dressing (OR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.41 3.07), difficulty in getting about (OR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.18 2.40), history of falls (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.05 1.94), abnormal gait (OR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.08 2.40) and abnormal motor strength (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.07 2.15). Sociodemographic factors such as older age and male sex were also significant predictors of decreased survival. These associations are potentially useful to clinicians and health professionals by providing prognostic information to supply to families and suggesting areas in which interventions to improve survival might be focused
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".