MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2466395328 · doi:10.3171/2016.5.jns153015

Imaging of spontaneous intraventricular rupture of a septum pellucidum colloid cyst: case report

2016· article· en· W2466395328 on OpenAlexaff
Harrison J. Westwick, Sami Obaïd, Florence Morin-Roy, Pierre‐Olivier Champagne, Alain Bouthillier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of neurosurgery · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalHôpital Notre-Dame
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColloid cystMedicineThird ventricleCystSeptum pellucidumCraniotomyHydrocephalusHeadachesAnatomyPathologyRadiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intraventricular rupture of a colloid cyst is a rare phenomenon and has been proposed as a mechanism for sudden death in patients with colloid cysts. Imaging of a colloid cyst during rupture has been described in only one other instance. The authors report a highly unusual case of a 53-year-old man who presented with acute onset headaches and imaging findings of hydrocephalus caused by a colloid cyst originating from the septum pellucidum and superior surface of the roof of the third ventricle. Interestingly, the colloid cyst revealed imaging signs of intraventricular rupture characterized by a tail-like drainage of cystic contents into the occipital horn of the lateral ventricle. The patient was surgically treated with a craniotomy and transcallosal approach to the colloid cyst, where it was noted that the cyst wall was spontaneously open. This rare case highlights unique imaging findings of a rare event in an infrequent pathology confirmed with intraoperative microscopy. The authors further document the process of cyst rupture and speculate on its pathomechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of neurosurgerySame topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207