Primary Multipoint (Segmental) Custom Ablation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: We present our experience in resolving visual symptoms in refractive patients undergoing primary multipoint (segmental) custom ablation. METHODS: Twelve eyes with mixed myopic astigmatism underwent evaluation and primary treatment by multipoint (segmental) custom ablation for the correction of refractive errors and visual symptoms using the Nidek NAVEX platform. RESULTS: Twelve eyes showed resolution of visual symptoms following diagnosis and treatment with MCA using the NAVEX platform. No patient lost two or more lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. The postoperative root mean square of higher order aberrations did not change in a predictable or reproducible fashion. CONCLUSION: Multipoint (segmental) custom ablation with the Nidek NAVEX system was safe and effective for correcting mixed myopic astigmatism and for resolving visual symptoms in selected refractive surgery candidates. Small changes in the root mean square of higher order aberration values were not always reflected in a patient's subjective assessment of vision quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it