„Ensuring a Society for All” – 21. Weltkongress von Rehabilitation International im August 2008 in Quebec, Kanada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In vierjährigem Turnus veranstaltet der in New York ansässige Fachverband Rehabilitation International (RI) einen Weltkongress, in dem sich Experten aller Erdteile aus den Bereichen Behindertenpolitik, Wissenschaft sowie Praxis der Rehabilitation und Teilhabeförderung über Erfahrungen, Entwicklungen, Forschungen und Fortschritte austauschen können, die Menschen mit Behinderungen betreffen. Im Vorfeld des Weltkongresses findet stets auch eine Jahres-Delegiertenversammlung (Governing Assembly) statt, die Vertreter von RI-Mitgliedsorganisationen in rund 100 Ländern weltweit zusammenführt, um über aktuelle Herausforderungen und die Strategien für kommende Jahre zu beraten. In diesem Umfeld gibt es zudem eine RI-Vorstands-Sitzung (Executive Committee), und es tagen auch zahlreiche RI-Kommissionen. Veranstaltungsort 2008 war vom 23. bis 27. August die frankokanadisch Provinz-Hauptstadt Quebec, die in diesem Jahr zudem ihr 400-jähriges Bestehen feierte.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".