MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2466696820 · doi:10.1055/s-0029-1214409

„Ensuring a Society for All” – 21. Weltkongress von Rehabilitation International im August 2008 in Quebec, Kanada

2009· article· de· W2466696820 on OpenAlex
Marcus Schian, M Schmollinger

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDie Rehabilitation · 2009
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMedical Practices and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceGynecologyArtHumanitiesMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In vierjährigem Turnus veranstaltet der in New York ansässige Fachverband Rehabilitation International (RI) einen Weltkongress, in dem sich Experten aller Erdteile aus den Bereichen Behindertenpolitik, Wissenschaft sowie Praxis der Rehabilitation und Teilhabeförderung über Erfahrungen, Entwicklungen, Forschungen und Fortschritte austauschen können, die Menschen mit Behinderungen betreffen. Im Vorfeld des Weltkongresses findet stets auch eine Jahres-Delegiertenversammlung (Governing Assembly) statt, die Vertreter von RI-Mitgliedsorganisationen in rund 100 Ländern weltweit zusammenführt, um über aktuelle Herausforderungen und die Strategien für kommende Jahre zu beraten. In diesem Umfeld gibt es zudem eine RI-Vorstands-Sitzung (Executive Committee), und es tagen auch zahlreiche RI-Kommissionen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it