Editorial/Éditorial: Volume 45 (issue/numéro 1), 2016
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Welcome to yet another rich and interesting issue of Comparative and International Education / Education Comparée et Internationale for your reading pleasure, during the forthcoming warm summer months!As you start turning the 'virtual' pages of our journal, you will notice that once again we have an article in French, along with four articles in English and two book reviews.Our continuous commitment to include one French article in each issue has resulted in more French submissions for research-based articles, book reviews and a request for a special issue.What this means is that we will need to reach out to some of our French-speaking readers and authors, who have expertise in topics related to comparative and international education, to review our French submissions as part of our double-blind peer review process.We are counting on your support!The common themes across all the articles in this issue range from internationalization of higher education and North-South partnerships, to debates about religion, acculturation and culture.This diversity in perspectives and languages is a testament to the true international nature of our journal and a wonderful reflection of our Canadian values of bilingualism and multiculturalism
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".