MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2466754287 · doi:10.1177/0954406216660736

Simplified Vibration Model and analysis of a single-conductor transmission line with dampers

2016· article· en· W2466754287 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDamperVibrationConductorFinite element methodSpring (device)Tuned mass damperStructural engineeringDamping torqueTransmission lineEquations of motionMode (computer interface)PhysicsLine (geometry)Electric power transmissionEngineeringMechanicsControl theory (sociology)AcousticsMathematicsClassical mechanicsComputer scienceGeometryElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel model is developed for a vibrating single-conductor transmission line carrying Stockbridge dampers. Experiments are performed to determine the equivalent viscous damping of the damper. This damper is then reduced to an equivalent discrete mass-spring-mass and viscous damping system. The equations of motion of the model are derived using Hamilton’s principle and explicit expressions are determined for the frequency equation, and mode shapes. The proposed model is verified using experimental and finite element results from the literature. This proposed model excellently captures free vibration characteristics of the system and the vibration level of the conductor, but performs poorly in regard to the vibration of the counterweights.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it