MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2466754287 · doi:10.1177/0954406216660736

Simplified Vibration Model and analysis of a single-conductor transmission line with dampers

2016· article· en· W2466754287 on OpenAlexaff
Oumar Barry, Rose Long, DCD Oguamanam

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDamperVibrationConductorFinite element methodSpring (device)Tuned mass damperStructural engineeringDamping torqueTransmission lineEquations of motionMode (computer interface)PhysicsLine (geometry)Electric power transmissionEngineeringMechanicsControl theory (sociology)AcousticsMathematicsClassical mechanicsComputer scienceGeometryElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel model is developed for a vibrating single-conductor transmission line carrying Stockbridge dampers. Experiments are performed to determine the equivalent viscous damping of the damper. This damper is then reduced to an equivalent discrete mass-spring-mass and viscous damping system. The equations of motion of the model are derived using Hamilton’s principle and explicit expressions are determined for the frequency equation, and mode shapes. The proposed model is verified using experimental and finite element results from the literature. This proposed model excellently captures free vibration characteristics of the system and the vibration level of the conductor, but performs poorly in regard to the vibration of the counterweights.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering ScienceSame topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207