MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2466763690 · doi:10.7870/cjcmh-2002-0024

Supplementary Issue Introduction: Family Transitions Related to Parental Separation

2002· article· en· W2466763690 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Richard Cloutier, Geneviève Alain

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Community Mental Health · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidencePsychosocialContext (archaeology)Variety (cybernetics)Mental healthFamily studiesFamily lifePsychologySociologyGender studiesGeographyPsychiatryDemographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The contemporary family is undergoing transformation, with the emergence of a greater variety of profiles and trajectories. Observers have been noting this family mobility for several decades and the trend it represents can be regarded as a lasting one, a phenomenon that people need to live with and adapt to. In this context, psychosocial research concerned with the development of people and their communities has taken an active interest in seeking strategies that help family members adjust. While the family is being transformed, it is still the main life context in our society: 85% of Canadians live in a private residence with family members (Statistics Canada, 1998). The contours of our communities are established by the families they comprise. Family health is a powerful determinant not only of the health of family members but also of community health. This supplementary issue of the Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health is devoted to family transitions related to parental separation or the placing of a child in substitute care. The articles represent an original spectrum of scientific contributions, in English and French, with an emphasis on the relational impact of family transitions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2100.037

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Community Mental HealthSame topicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingFrench-language works237,207