MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2466927139 · doi:10.1080/13543776.2016.1206080

Proprotein convertase subtilisin / kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and the future of dyslipidemia therapy: an updated patent review (2011-2015)

2016· review· en· W2466927139 on OpenAlexaff
Sandy Elbitar, Petra El Khoury, Youmna Ghaleb, Jean‐Pierre Rabès, Mathilde Varret, Nabil G. Seidah, Cathérine Boileau, Marianne Abifadel

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Clinical Research Institute
FundersFondation Leducq
KeywordsPCSK9AlirocumabEvolocumabKexinProprotein convertaseDyslipidemiaMedicinePharmacologyMonoclonal antibodyCholesterolLDL receptorAntibodyInternal medicineImmunologyLipoproteinDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The identification by Abifadel et al. in 2003 of the first mutations of PCSK9 was the major breakthrough in the cholesterol field that led to a new therapeutic target. This discovery paved the way to new lipid lowering drugs reducing LDL-cholesterol levels through the inhibition of PCSK9. Two anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies have received FDA and EMA approvals: Alirocumab and Evolocumab. Areas covered: This article reviews the different strategies that are pursued to modulate the functional activity of PCSK9 for lowering LDL-cholesterol levels. It also provides a brief overview of the patents related to PCSK9 from 2011 until the end of 2015. This review is addressed to researchers from academia and pharmaceutical companies who are engaged in PCSK9 research/cholesterol regulation. Readers will gain an up-to-date overview of the different strategies that have been investigated to reduce PCSK9, focusing on anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies and the related clinical trials. Expert opinion: Anti-PCSK9 antibodies are a new class of lipid lowering drugs with promising results in reducing LDL-cholesterol. Long-term ongoing studies investigating on a large scale the efficacy and safety of the anti-PCSK9 antibodies and their cardiovascular outcomes are eagerly awaited.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic PatentsSame topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthFrench-language works237,207