Unless: A Covert Post-Colonial and Transnational Gothic Novel, Or The Haunted House (of Fiction) Is Falling Apart
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cynthia Sugars and Gerry Turcotte have drawn attention to the rise of the Canadian post-colonial and transnational Gothic in recent years. This article argues that Carol Shields’s Unless is not only a covert post-colonial and transnational Gothic, alluding to Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre , but it also presents us with a writer of such a work as the protagonist. Shields thus highlights the role of the writer and (his or) her negotiation with ghosts in the revision of traumatic national history and the idea of the nation. In Unless , the British-French Canadian writer Reta Winters must realize the ongoing trauma of the “other” in multicultural Canada. The colonial Gothic discourse of the unified nation and alien ghosts from beyond the border perpetuates xenophobia. Reta’s interrogation of this discourse turns into a revisionist Gothic in which the ghosts protest the inauthenticity of the Canadian nation-state and its violence against diverse “others.” Reta utilizes the figure of the ghost, traditionally associated with the resurfacing of repressed memories and boundary dissolution, as a tool of discursive revision. Deconstruction of colonial Gothic discourse ultimately clears space for a vision of a transnational Canada in which the border becomes a cultural bridge. Yet Reta is both in pursuit of and in flight from the ghosts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".