MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2467294768 · doi:10.3920/978-90-8686-781-3_142

Rate of rumen epithelial adaptation for sodium and short chain fatty acid absorption

2013· book-chapter· en· W2467294768 on OpenAlexaff
B. L. Schurmann, M. E. Walpole, P. Górka, G.B. Penner

Bibliographic record

VenueWageningen Academic Publishers eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRumenAbsorption (acoustics)Fatty acidChemistrySodiumSubstrate (aquarium)Adaptation (eye)Food scienceBiochemistryBiologyFermentationMaterials scienceEcologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Past studies evaluating ruminal adaptation have largely focused on changes in papillae surface area and epithelial histology as indicators for adaptation. However, abruptly increasing the proportion of dietary concentrate increases the net flux of Na + (J net-Na ) with marked changes occurring within one week of the dietary change (Etschmann et al. , 2009). Given that J net-Na is driven via an ATP-dependent electrochemical gradient, the increase in J net-Na indicates that there must also be corresponding increases in energy substrate transport to supply cellular ATP. Presumably, the primary energy substrates would be from apical absorption of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA; Bergman, 1990). The objectives of this study were to establish the timeline for SCFA and Na + absorption across the ruminal epithelia following an abrupt increase in diet fermentability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWageningen Academic Publishers eBooksSame topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207