QCD test with the momentum spectra and the second binomial moment <i>R</i><sub>2</sub> using e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>−</sup> data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experimental data on the shape of hadronic momentum spectra are compared to the context of calculations in modified leading log approximation (MLLA), under the assumption of local parton hadron duality (LPHD). Considered are the inclusive momentum spectra and charged particle distributions in the reaction e+e− → hadrons, using the experimental as well as the Monte Carlo data at center of mass energies up to 200 GeV. Values of the second binomial moment R2 obtained from the multiplicity distributions are also studied. Our results are compared with both experimental data from high and low energy e+e−, e−p, and pp experiments and QCD calculations in various theoretical approaches. In general, good agreement is found between the measurements and the corresponding QCD predictions. A quantitative check of LPHD + MLLA has been performed by extracting a value of the strong coupling constant from the corresponding distributions. Possible explanations for all these features will be presented in this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".