MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2467917352 · doi:10.1364/ome.6.001079

Advances in methods of purification and dispersion measurement applicable to tellurite-based glasses

2016· article· en· W2467917352 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mathieu Boivin, Mohammed El-Amraoui, Simon Poliquin, Réal Vallée, Younès Messaddeq

Bibliographic record

VenueOptical Materials Express · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGlass properties and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesCanada Research ChairsCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsMaterials scienceRefractive indexThermal stabilityHydrochloric acidDispersion (optics)CrystallizationPrismSupercontinuumAbsorption (acoustics)InfraredReagentAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OpticsChemical engineeringOptoelectronicsComposite materialChemistryOrganic chemistryWavelengthMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptical Materials Express→Same topicGlass properties and applications→French-language works237,207→