MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W246809343

Nootens (Thierry), Fous, prodigues et ivrognes. Familles et déviance à Montréal au XIXe siècle. Montréal et Kingston, London, Ithaca, McGill-Quenn’s University Press, 2007, 308 pp. , 12 tableaux statistiques, ISBN 9780773 531840

2010· article· fr· W246809343 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michel Porret

Bibliographic record

VenueCrime Histoire et Sociétés · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtSociologyJargonPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Avec parfois un brin de didactisme outre, de jargon sociologisant, de repetitions formelles ainsi que de naivete descriptive sur la philosophie du droit, la nosographie de la folie, les rapports professionnels entre alienistes et psychiatres ou sur la qualification de la « dangerosite », Thierry Nootens etudie 511 procedures d’internement instruites et engagees entre 1820 et 1895 inclusivement dans le district judiciaire de Montreal. Sans toujours donner les reperes necessaires sur le fonctio...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrime Histoire et SociétésSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207