MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2468259478

Crónica de la Jurisprudencia del Tribunal de Justicia de las Comunidades Europeas: Sentencia Skatteverket - Sentencia de 11 de diciembre de 2007 (Gran Sala), International Transport Workers' Federation (Viking Line), asunto C-438/05 - Sentencia de 18 de diciembre de 2007 (Gran Sala), Laval un Partneri, asunto C-341/05

2008· article· es· W2468259478 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carlos Gimeno Verdejo, María Isabel Rofes i Pujol

Bibliographic record

VenueCuadernos Europeos de Deusto · 2008
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTaxation and Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTribunalPolitical scienceHumanitiesLawJurisprudencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La sentencia Skatteverket. Aclaraciones sobre la aplicacion del principio de libre circulacion de capitales en las relaciones entre los Estados miembros y los paises terceros. Alcance del derecho a adoptar medidas de conflicto colectivo como derecho fundamental que forma parte de los principios generales del derecho comunitario cuyo respeto garantiza el Tribunal de Justicia. El derecho de establecimiento en el sector de los transportes maritimos y el registro de un buque bajo el pabellon de otro Estado miembro: sentencia de 11 de diciembre de 2007 (Gran Sala), International Transport Workers' Federation (Viking Line), asunto C-438/05. La libre prestacion de servicios con desplazamiento de trabajadores en el sector de la construccion: sentencia de 18 de diciembre de 2007 (Gran Sala), Laval un Partneri, asunto C-341/05

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.012
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCuadernos Europeos de DeustoSame topicTaxation and Legal IssuesFrench-language works237,207