Les femmes célibataires dans la presse canadienne : entre liberté et aspirations familiales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comme dans les autres pays postindustrialisés, les données démographiques canadienne et québécoise font apparaître l’importance de plus en plus grandissante des femmes célibataires vivant en solo. Remettant en question un style de vie fondé sur le couple, la famille et la progéniture, elles font l’objet d ¹ une couverture médiatique tant dans le milieu francophone qu’anglophone. L’analyse des thèmes portant sur les célibataires dans les articles de journaux parus entre 2000 et 2007 met en relief plusieurs enjeux : la progression significative du célibat ; les contradictions dans le style de vie ; la quête du partenaire et les stratégies impliquées ; les préoccupations face à la maternité et à la reproduction ainsi que les contraintes biomédicales qui en découlent. Le traitement journalistique de ces thèmes montre une préférence pour la description des milieux sociaux favorisés, un biais hétérosexuel et le recours à des stratégies narratives multiples pour décrire une réalité aux facettes complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".