MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2468405132

Development of a very sensitive luminescence assay for the measurement of paclitaxel and related taxanes.

2000· article· en· W2468405132 on OpenAlexaff
Veronique Guillemard, C. Bicamumpaka, Najee Boucher, Melissa M. Page

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCegep de Sainte Foy
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaclitaxelTaxaneChemistryTaxusMonoclonal antibodyImmunoassayPharmacologyChromatographyCancerAntibodyBiologyMedicineBreast cancerImmunologyInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A rapid and very sensitive enzyme immunoassay was developed for the measurement of paclitaxel and related taxanes in crude extracts of Taxus sp., in human serum and in culture medium of paclitaxel-producing microorganisms such as Erwinia taxi. For the ELISA, paclitaxel was chemically modified by the introduction of an amine to enable coupling with biotin. The presence of paclitaxel or related taxanes competitively inhibited the binding of paclitaxel-biotin to anti-taxane monoclonal antibody. This method detected paclitaxel in concentrations as low as 33 pM; the affinity of the antibody was higher for paclitaxel than for cephalomanine, baccatin and DAB. The sensitivity of this assay makes it useful for estimating the paclitaxel and taxanes content of Taxus sp. extracts, monitoring the paclitaxel serum level of paclitaxel treated patients and in other biological fluids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207