MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2468564096 · doi:10.1093/logcom/exv031

A modal separation logic for resource dynamics

2015· article· en· W2468564096 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Logic and Computation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed systems and fault tolerance
Canadian institutionsPrevention of Organ Failure
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsSeparation logicComputer scienceModal logicModalDynamic logic (digital electronics)Resource (disambiguation)Epistemic modal logicTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmMultimodal logicDescription logicEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The logic of Bunched implications (BI), and its Boolean version (Boolean BI), are logics that allow us to express properties on resources and to provide logical frameworks for the so-called separation logics. In this article, we study a new modal separation logic that extends Boolean BI with two kinds of modalities, to deal with resources having dynamic properties (which depend on the current state of a system) and also to capture some resource evolutions or transformations. We show how we can model concurrent processes manipulating resources, and we provide a sound and complete tableau calculus, with a counter-model extraction method, for proving properties expressed in this logic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.201

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it