Relações de gênero na sala de aula: atividades de fronteira e jogos de separação nas práticas escolares
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente texto, ao considerar gênero como categoria, descreve e analisa atividades, situações e eventos do cotidiano escolar, na sala de aula. Trata-se de conhecimento produzido no âmbito de pesquisa de doutorado e que busca saber como a escola está, em suas atividades habituais e rotineiras, implicada nos processos de diferenciação e de desigualdade entre o feminino e o masculino. O presente texto reforça ainda a importância de saber qual uso é feito das relações de gênero para organizar o trabalho na escola e, em contrapartida, como o trabalho escolar pode influenciar as relações de gênero socialmente vigentes. Produções francesas, canadenses, catalãs e anglo-saxãs, resultantes de extensa pesquisa em bibliotecas nacionais e internacionais, destacam-se como referenciais teóricos das análises realizadas. Para a produção deste texto, tão importante quanto esse corpus bibliográfico, foi a pesquisa de campo realizada em escola pública de Ensino Fundamental, durante dois anos, na cidade de São Paulo.Abstract: The present work, while considering gender as category, describes and analyzes flashes of classroom everyday life. It is about knowledge constructed for doctorate research, and it aims to know how schools are implied in the processes of differentiation and inequality between feminine and masculine in their habitual and routine activities. The text also strengthens the importance of getting to know how gender relations are used in the organization of school work and, at the same time, how school work can influence the socially established gender relations. French, Canadian, Catalan and Anglo-Saxon productions, found out during extensive research in national and international libraries, are distinguished as theoretical bases of the analyses that were carried out. This bibliographical corpus was very important for writing this text, as well as the field research, carried out in public schools of elementary education for two years, in the city of São Paulo, Brazil.Key words: Gender relations. School practices. Mixité. Equality and difference. Sociology of Education
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".