MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2468786109 · doi:10.5555/2500004.2500023

Data mining using ANN for finding the effects of building structure on thermal comfort parameters (WIP)

2013· article· en· W2468786109 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnual Simulation Symposium · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Computer scienceThermal comfortArtificial neural networkData miningWireless sensor networkWork flowData modelingMachine learningEngineeringIndustrial engineeringDatabaseComputer networkMechanical engineeringMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main objective of this work is to use artificial neural network for data mining in the thermal comfort data of a building environment datasets collected by wireless sensor network. Currently there are many research activities trying to use data mining methods to find data patterns in the machine generated data (i.e., big data). The data collected in this work are composed of temperature, humidity and air flow values of 4th floor of the educational building. The main goal of this research is to find the effects of building structure design on the collected parameters. This will help to answer the questions regarding to change the structure design and examine the effects on thermal comfort parameters in a building.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.405

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it