MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2468906143 · doi:10.55016/ojs/ajer.v50i3.55092

The Effects of Ethnic Capital and Family Background on School Performance: A Case Study of Chinese-Canadian Adolescents in Calgary

2004· article· en· W2468906143 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Henry P. H. Chow

Bibliographic record

VenueAlberta Journal of Educational Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParental Involvement in Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGovernment of CanadaUniversity of Regina
KeywordsPhysicsStereochemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction The v i t a l i t y of e d u c a t i o n a l va lues a n d w o r k o r i e n t a t i o n as a n aspect of C h i n e s e cu l ture is w i d e l y r e c o g n i z e d . A s n o t e d b y S tevenson and Lee (1996), the m o t i v a t i o n for a c a d e m i c ach ievement i n C h i n e s e societies is m u l t i p l y determ i n e d , i n c l u d i n g the r e c o g n i t i o n that e d u c a t i o n is a c r u c i a l c h a n n e l of u p w a r d soc ia l a n d e c o n o m i c m o b i l i t y a n d the a s s u m p t i o n that e d u c a t i o n offers a n a v e n u e t h r o u g h w h i c h one m a y advance as a m o r a l p e r s o n . A s s c h o o l per for m a n c e is genera l ly r e g a r d e d as an ear ly i n d i c a t o r of success for i m m i g r a n t s tudents a n d serves as a p r e p a r a t i o n for the future i n a career, e d u c a t i o n a l researchers a n d pract i t ioners h a v e l o n g been interested i n u n d e r s t a n d i n g the l i n k b e t w e e n s t u d e n t s ' f a m i l y b a c k g r o u n d a n d academic p e r f o r m a n c e (Astone & M c L a n a h a n , 1991; C h o w , 2000; L i n n e h a n , 2001; V a l e n z u e l a & D o r n b u s c h , 1994). F a m i l y b a c k g r o u n d , a c c o r d i n g to C o l e m a n (1988), is a n a l y t i c a l l y separable in to at least three d i s t inc t c o m p o n e n t s : f i n a n c i a l capi ta l , h u m a n c a p i t a l , a n d soc ia l c a p i t a l . P h y s i c a l resources that a i d ach ievement , c o m m o n l y m e a s u r e d b y the f a m i l y ' s w e a l t h or i n c o m e , are c o n s i d e r e d to be f i n a n c i a l capi ta l . H u m a n c a p i t a l , w h i c h const i tutes the p o t e n t i a l for a c o g n i t i v e e n v i r o n m e n t that is c o n d u c i v e to c h i l d r e n ' s l e a r n i n g , is u s u a l l y m e a s u r e d b y parents ' e d u c a t i o n . Soc ia l c a p i t a l is the least tangib le as it exists o n l y i n the re la t ionships a m o n g persons a n d is d e f i n e d b y its f u n c t i o n . T h e s t u d y of e thnic m i n o r i t y s tudents m u s t also take ethnic capi ta l into c o n s i d e r a t i o n ; this c a n be b r o a d l y c o n s t r u e d as a n i n d i v i d u a l ' s degree of ethnic connectedness a n d i n t e r n a l i z a t i o n of e thnic c u l t u r a l values that p r o v i d e s the i m p e t u s for a c h i e v i n g academic excellence. N o t i c e a b l y , the e d u c a t i o n a l success a m o n g A s i a n s tudents i n the U n i t e d States has led to their b e i n g labeled m o d e l m i n o r i t y 1 ( K a o , 1995; W o n g , L a i , N a g a s a w a , & L i n , 1998; Y i n g et a l . , 2001). It has been c o n t e n d e d that v a r i o u s characterist ics of A s i a n cu l ture s u c h as d o c i l i t y , i n d u s t r i o u s n e s s , respect for a u t h o r i t y , a n d e m p h a s i s o n l e a r n i n g are h i g h l y c o m p a t i b l e w i t h those r e q u i r e d for academic success (Peng & W r i g h t , 1994). There is n o shortage of s tudies d o c u m e n t i n g the e x t r a o r d i n a r y e d u c a t i o n a l a t ta inment of the A s i a n p o p u l a t i o n , i n c l u d i n g the C h i n e s e , i n the U S ( A s a k a w a & C s i k s z e n t m i h a l y i , 2000; C a p l a n , C h o y , & W h i t m o r e , 1992; C h e n & Steven-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score0.630

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlberta Journal of Educational ResearchSame topicParental Involvement in EducationFrench-language works237,207