MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2468951234 · doi:10.7202/1028562ar

Des services documentaires adaptés aux personnes handicapées à l’Université de Montréal

2015· article· fr· W2468951234 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Marc Joanis

Bibliographic record

VenueDocumentation et bibliothèques · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les étudiants handicapés s’inscrivent en nombre sans cesse croissant à l’Université de Montréal. L’exploitation de la documentation étant au coeur de la formation universitaire, des services documentaires adaptés sont offerts à tous les étudiants handicapés. De tels services se développent dans le cadre des bibliothèques selon un concept d’intégration des fonctions de lecture et d’écriture, deux activités qui sont pratiquées de manière indissociable par les étudiants dans les bibliothèques universitaires. Un local doté d’équipements issus de technologies récentes a été aménagé à la Bibliothèque des lettres et des sciences humaines. On constate toutefois que le succès des services adaptés auprès des étudiants tient principalement à l’action du personnel qui leur est exclusivement consacré et à une approche humaine et personnalisée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.008
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDocumentation et bibliothèquesSame topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207