MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2469012352 · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsw104

Determining natal sources of capelin in a boreal marine park using otolith microchemistry

2016· article· en· W2469012352 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Angélique Lazartigues, Stéphane Plourde, Julian J. Dodson, Olivier Morissette, Patrick Ouellet, Pascal Sirois

Bibliographic record

VenueICES Journal of Marine Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalFisheries and Oceans CanadaUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaParks CanadaFisheries and Oceans CanadaUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
KeywordsCapelinForage fishOtolithFisheryHabitatTrophic levelPopulationEcologyGeographyPredationEnvironmental scienceBiologyFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effectiveness of marine conservation areas are influenced by the structure of the food webs they encompass, including the population dynamics of potentially important forage species that occupy trophic positions between those of zooplankton and higher trophic levels. Capelin is a key forage species for marine mammals, seabirds, and fish in the Saguenay-St. Lawrence Marine Park (SSLMP, Canada), yet knowledge on its population dynamics is incomplete. In particular, the natal sources sustaining this critical forage species within the conservation area remain unknown. Otolith microchemistry as an index of natal habitat was investigated, including measures of boron, barium, iron, magnesium, manganese, and strontium over the protracted spawning season of capelin. Otolith microchemistry indicated that the principal natal source of 1+ capelin found within the SSLMP was located in the St. Lawrence estuary, outside the conservation area boundaries. To ensure the sustainability key forage species within the conservation area, larger scale long-term management strategies are necessary to encompass ecological processes related to capelin that extend beyond the conservation area boundaries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueICES Journal of Marine ScienceSame topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207