In vitro evaluation of percutaneous absorption of an acyclovir product using intact and tape-stripped human skin.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of a flow-through diffusion cell system to assess the absorption and penetration characteristics of drug (acyclovir) products. METHODS: In vitro studies were performed to assess the absorption/penetration of acyclovir using a flow-through diffusion cell system with human skin sections obtained from 19 healthy women following mammoplasty. The skin sections, 200-400 microm thick, were prepared using a dermatome. Acyclovir ointment (approximately 10 mg) spiked with (3)H-labelled acyclovir was applied onto the stratum corneum/epidermis side. The skin sections were continually perfused on the dermis side with sterilized culture medium, Buffered Hanks' Balanced Salt Solution, saturated with a CO(2)/O(2) (5/95%). RESULTS: After 24 hours, the percentages of acyclovir-derived radioactivity (based on dose applied) in different components were as follows: stratum corneum (SC), 0.20+0.28; viable skin (VS), 0.40+0.38; effluent fluid (EF), 0.25+0.53. A second set of experiments was performed using tape stripped (10X) skin sections. Levels of acyclovir-derived radioactivity were VS, 1.21+1.43 and EF, 2.65+2.61, which were threefold higher (p < 0.05) for VS and elevenfold higher (p < 0.05) for EF compared to the results obtained with the intact skin sections. CONCLUSIONS: The SC is the main barrier layer for the penetration of acyclovir through human skin. The use of the flow-through diffusion cell system provides an appropriate in vitro model to assess the absorption/penetration of acyclovir through human skin layers and therefore can potentially be used for dermal formulation characterization and development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".