MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2469127673 · doi:10.1080/03736687.2016.1183072

The genus<i>Aitchisoniella</i>Kashyap (Marchantiopsida, Cleveaceae) new to China, and its taxonomic placement

2016· article· en· W2469127673 on OpenAlexaff
David G. Long, Laura L. Forrest, Juan Carlos Villarreal, Barbara Crandall‐Stotler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bryology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBryophyte Studies and Records
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersSibbald TrustNational Science Foundation
KeywordsThallusReceptacleBiologyGenusBotanySporophyte

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The genus Aitchisoniella with a single species A. himalayensis (Marchantiopsida, Cleveaceae), previously considered endemic to the north-west Himalayas of India, is reported for the first time from Sichuan Province, China. The genus is distinctive amongst complex thalloid liverworts in lacking stalked carpocephala but having archegonia and sporophytes borne on the ventral side of a short receptacle arising in a terminal thallus bifurcation. The receptacle tissue is continuous with that of the main thallus, with dorsal air chambers and air pores, and a ventral groove containing pegged rhizoids. Both molecular data and morphological characters, particularly spore ornamentation, suggest that its previous placement in Exormothecaceae is incorrect and it is now transferred to Cleveaceae, wherein it becomes the fifth genus. Revised descriptions of the families Cleveaceae and Corsiniaceae (including Exormothecaceae) are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of BryologySame topicBryophyte Studies and RecordsFrench-language works237,207