MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2469185830

The Effect of Data Density on the Accuracy of Foot-Line Determination Through Maximum Curvature Surface by Automatic Ridge-Tracing Algorithm

2015· article· en· W2469185830 on OpenAlexaff
Ziqiang Ou, Petr Vaníček

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Hydrographic Review · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBathymetryRidgeCurvatureInterval (graph theory)Line (geometry)GeodesyGeologyData setTracingAlgorithmMathematicsGeometryComputer scienceStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The influence of data density on the accuracy of foot-line determination by the automatic ridge-tracing algorithm is investigated through a set of simulated bathymetric surfaces. The results show that no obvious differences exist for different sea bottom morphology, different depths and gradients of continental slope when data are dense enough, i.e., when the data interval is smaller than some 12.5 km. When the data are very sparse, the accuracy of the foot-line determination becomes worse as the surfaces become more complicated or the gradients become steep. Approximately, the root mean square error of foot-line determination is equal to one third of the data interval and the areal error is 23km 2 /100km foot-line length per one kilometre of the data interval.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Hydrographic ReviewSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207