Un engagement collectif pour maintenir et rehausser les compétences en littératie des adultes [ressource électronique] : avis à la ministre de l'éducation, du loisir et du sport et au ministre de l'enseignement supérieur, de la recherche, de la science et de la technologie : version abrégée
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet avis, le Conseil exprime sa vive preoccupation devant le nombre considerable d'adultes quebecois qui ont un niveau insuffisant de competence en litteratie. Aussi lance-t-il un appel a la mobilisation concertee des pouvoirs politiques de meme que des organismes communautaires et des milieux du travail, de l'emploi, de la sante, de la culture et de l'education. Dans cet avis, le Conseil propose deux perspectives pour aborder la litteratie des adultes. La premiere repose sur la mesure des competences. La deuxieme perspective s'interesse au rapport a l'ecrit des adultes qui ont un faible niveau de litteratie et aux pratiques qu'ils ont adoptees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.058 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".