A Lightweight Social Computing Approach to Emergency Management Policy Selection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to select effective policies for emergency management in a timely manner, this paper proposes an agile and lightweight social computing approach to facilitating policy selection, evaluation, and adjustment relative to emergency management in both quantitative and qualitative ways. The approach consists of three components represented as PZE: 1) (P) emergency management policy selecting; 2) (Z) modeling artificial societies with the zombie-city model (a general and formal artificial society model); and 3) (E) policy evaluation. The formal specification of the zombie-city model and rigorous expressions of scenarios enable rigorous description and formal reasoning of an artificial society. A feedback loop of this approach supports the iterative adjustment of emergency management policies and the creation of more effective policies. This approach is verified by applying it to a case of an infectious disease transmission with quantitative evaluations, qualitative reasoning and analysis, and iterative adjustments. Results indicate effective emergency management policies can be established with the approach in an iterative way. In contrast with existing research, our proposed approach offers the benefits of being simple, general, rapidly adaptive to changes, and low cost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".