MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2469321173 · doi:10.2118/172572-pa

Stimulation of Seawater Injectors by GLDA (Glutamic-Di Acetic Acid)

2016· article· en· W2469321173 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Drilling & Completion · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsAkzoNobel (Canada)
FundersKing Abdulaziz City for Science and TechnologyKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
KeywordsSeawaterSolubilityPrecipitationAnhydriteChemistryCarbonateCalciumSulfateCalcium carbonateChelationGypsumInorganic chemistryGeologyOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceMetallurgyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Seawater is injected to maintain the reservoir pressure that supports the oil production from carbonate and sandstone reservoirs. In certain regions, the seawater contains more than 4,000 ppm sulfate, and the formation contains more than 19,000 ppm calcium; this will cause calcium sulfate precipitation at the reservoir conditions. The precipitate at the reservoir conditions will be anhydrite, and it will cause formation damage that will reduce the well injectivity. Stimulation treatments are required to recover the well injectivity; this requires stopping water injection to perform the stimulation treatments, and also it requires flowing back the well after stimulation treatment. In this study, we are proposing a new method that we can use to stimulate water injectors without stopping the water injection. The new method includes adding a chelating agent to the injected seawater at the wellhead at 15 wt% concentration. The fluid will be injected at the surface with the seawater with a specific dose to achieve the required concentration. Several solubility and coreflooding tests were performed with actual carbonate cores and GLDA (glutamic-di acetic acid) chelating agent at different temperatures. The chemical injection does not need coiled tubing and can be injected at the surface with the seawater. The chelating agents will sequester all calcium in solution and will prevent the calcium sulfate precipitation. GLDA chelating agent will be used with seawater, with no need to use treated or fresh water. Also, flowing back the well is not required because the fate of GLDA in the aquifer is soluble. Solubility tests up to 250°F at high pressure showed that the GLDA is stable with seawater. Coreflood experiments and computed-tomography scans showed the ability of GLDA in the creation of dominant wormholes through 6- and 1.5-in. carbonate cores at 212 and 150°F, respectively. GLDA chelating agent can be used to stimulate seawater injectors without additives because this chemical is stable and mild with the well tubulars. Previous corrosion studies on GLDA showed that its corrosion rate is in the allowable range without adding corrosion inhibitors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it