Abstraction and Productivity: Structures of Intentionality and Action in Marx’s Capital
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Johnny Cash's 'The Ballad of John Henry' (1963), John's father, before being hauled off to jail, admonishes his son to learn all the skills of a railroad worker, ending with this promise: 'And take that hammer; it'll do anything you tell it to.' However, when John goes to the foreman of the railroad crew and enumerates his skills, he responds to the foreman's question, 'Can you swing that hammer?' by saying, 'I'll do anything you hire me to.' John's father thought he was bequeathing to his son the means by which John could provide for the family and do what he wanted. The hammer and John's skill in using it were supposed to be the vehicles of the worker's desires. The hammer was supposed to obey him. Instead, John, with his hammer and his skill, ends up serving only the desires of his boss. John himself becomes a tool and, in the end, works himself to death to prove that he can be a more effective instrument than the steam drill brought in to replace him. The promised instrumentality of the hammer is transmuted into the instrumentality of the worker.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".