Human chondroprogenitors in alginate-collagen hybrid scaffolds produce stable cartilage<i>in vivo</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of this study was to evaluate human epiphyseal chondroprogenitor cells (ECPs) as a potential new cell source for cartilage regeneration. ECPs were compared to human bone marrow stromal cells (MSCs) and human adult articular chondrocytes (ACs) for their chondrogenic potential and phenotypic stability in vitro and in vivo. The cells were seeded in Optimaix-3D scaffolds at 5 × 104 cells/mm3 and gene expression, matrix production and mechanical properties were analysed up to 6 weeks. In vitro, ECPs synthesized consistently high collagen 2 and low collagen 10. AC-seeded constructs exhibited high donor variability in GAG/DNA values as well as in collagen 2 staining, but showed low collagen 10 production. MSCs, on the other hand, expressed high levels of collagen 2 but also of collagens 1 and 10, and were therefore not considered further. In vivo, there was considerable loss of matrix proteins in ECPs compared to in vitro cultured samples. To overcome this, a second implantation study investigated the effect of mixing cells with alginate prior to seeding in the scaffold. ECPs in alginate maintained their cartilage matrix and resisted mineralization and vessel infiltration better 6 weeks after subcutaneous implantation, whereas ACs lost their chondrogenic matrix completely. This study shows the great potential of ECPs as an off-the-shelf, highly chondrogenic cell type that produces stable cartilage in vivo. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it