The Minoritarian Turn in Nineteenth-Century American Literary Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three recent publications in nineteenth-century American literary studies are compelling examples of the field’s turn toward “minoritarian” criticism, a mode of inquiry that draws on a variety of “minor” movements in scholarship such as queer studies and critical race and ethnic studies. The collection of essays in Unsettled States exemplify the minoritarian impulse to treat literary and archival texts as theoretical objects coeval with the authority of contemporary scholarship and cultural theory. One of the contributors to Unsettled States, Kyla Wazana Tompkins, also authored Racial Indigestion, a foundational text in recent food studies that authoritatively traces the erotic politics of the mouth over the long nineteenth century. In The Delectable Negro, the late Vincent Woodward provocatively addresses the ways bodies of enslaved African Americans were cannibalized, metaphorically and literally, by parasitic slave masters. All three texts stake out new practices, objects, and methods for the field, and suggest vital new directions for future scholarship.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".