MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2469883684

Ileal conduit stomal hemorrhage as the first presentation of end stage liver disease: case report and review of the literature.

2009· article· en· W2469883684 on OpenAlexaff
Luke T. Lavallée, Greg Trottier, Greg Bailly

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBalloon tamponadeTransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shuntPortal hypertensionSurgeryLiver diseasePortosystemic shuntShunt (medical)TamponadeGeneral surgeryCirrhosisInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hemorrhage from an ileal conduit is a rare and potentially life threatening event with only 17 cases reported in the medical literature. We present the unique case of an 83-year-old patient with acute stomal hemorrhage as the first sign of underlying liver disease and portal hypertension. Bleeding was controlled with conservative measures including balloon tamponade, betablockade, octreotide, and suture ligation. Our review of the literature revealed multiple management options for stomal hemorrhage with most authors advocating definitive management via portosystemic shunt creation, either surgically, or with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). In all cases the incidence of rebleeding associated with the procedure, and the ability of the patient to undergo invasive procedures, must be considered carefully.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicLiver Disease and TransplantationFrench-language works237,207