<b><i>Métis in Canada: History, Identity, Law and Politics</i></b>. Edited by Christopher Adams , Gregg Dahl , and Ian Peach . (Edmonton: University of Alberta Press, 2013. xxviii + 530 pp. Illustrations, chart, tables, notes, bibliography, index. CAN$65.00, paper.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Métis in Canada: History, Identity, Law and Politics Get access Métis in Canada: History, Identity, Law and Politics. Edited by Adams Christopher Dahl Gregg Peach Ian. (Edmonton: University of Alberta Press, 2013. xxviii + 530 pp. Illustrations, chart, tables, notes, bibliography, index. CAN$65.00, paper.) Heather Devine Heather Devine University of Calgary Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Western Historical Quarterly, Volume 45, Issue 2, Summer 2014, Pages 199–200, https://doi.org/10.2307/westhistquar.45.2.0199 Published: 01 May 2014
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".