The settlement of Jerusalem's western hill and the City's status in iron age II revisited
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The accumulation of new data from recent excavations and surveys, both within and outside Jerusalem, and especially the publication of the first two volumes of the final report of the Jewish Quarter excavations (Avigad/Geva 2000; Geva [ed.] 2003), call for a new evalua tion of Iron Age Jerusalem. Geva, who is publishing the Jewish Quarter excavations, has recently offered a thought provoking synthesis (below). Triggered by Geva's interpretations, along with the accumulation of the new data, it is the aim of the present paper to reanalyze the urban fabric and demographic composition of Jerusalem, and especially its Western Hill, during Iron Age II. The first part of the paper will, in light of the above, reexamine Geva's suggestions. The second part of the paper will discuss additional evidence for Jerusalem's status, mainly from finds discovered outside the city walls. The third part will reconstruct the 8th century city, including social aspects, settlement, and urban processes. The fourth part will discuss the chronology of these settlement processes, and the fifth part will reexamine the demography of Jerusalem at its height.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it