MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Release Behaviors of Arsenic in Fine Particles Generated from a Typical High-Arsenic Coal at a High Temperature

2016· article· en· W2470172933 on OpenAlexafffund
Chong Tian, Rajender Gupta, Yongchun Zhao, Junying Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCoal and Its By-products
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersState Key Laboratory of Environmental GeochemistryNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationCanadian Centre for Clean Coal/Carbon and Mineral Processing TechnologiesHelmholtz-GemeinschaftMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsArsenicPyriteCoalParticulatesCombustionPyrolysisChemistryEnvironmental chemistrySulfurMineralogyCoal combustion products

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To make an accurate assessment on transformation behaviors of arsenic in coal at a high temperature, a typical high-arsenic coal collected from southwest China has been chosen in the study and a series of high-temperature experiments in different atmospheres have been conducted with the help of a lab-scale drop-tube furnace. Fine particulate matter were collected by a low-pressure impactor, for obtaining their mass size distributions and further quantifying for arsenic distributions and speciation in fine particles of different sizes. The results indicated that the bleeding ratios of arsenic in air combustion, CO 2 gasification, and N 2 pyrolysis were 85, 65, and 45%, respectively, at 1300 °C. The ratio was found to remain relatively constant when the temperature increased from 1200 to 1400 °C. Organically associated arsenic would be more inclined to vaporize in N 2 pyrolysis, while both organic and inorganic associated arsenic would vaporize in CO 2 gasification and air combustion. Pyrite-associated arsenic would vaporize together with sulfur in pyrite inclusions. The decomposition of pyrite followed the principle of an unreacted core model and was mostly controlled by the surface sulfur vapor pressure. Mass size distributions of fine particulate matter generated from coal gasification presented a bimodal distribution, and two major peaks appeared at 0.4 and 5 μm. Particles in the size range of 5 μm were presented as a round shape with pores and cracks on the surface, while particles in the size range of 0.4 μm were confirmed to be soot. Arsenic was obviously enriched in fine particles with a size of around 0.1–0.2 μm in both combustion and gasification. The major speciation of arsenic identified in fine particles generated from coal combustion was As 2 O 5 and Ca 3 (AsO 4 ) 2, while that in fine particles generated from coal gasification was As 2 O 5, As, AsO, and Ca 3 (AsO 4 ) 2 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicCoal and Its By-productsFrench-language works237,207