New Mineral NamesAradite and ZadoviteChlorkyuygenite, Fluorkyuygenite, FluormayeniteChubaroviteCryobostryxiteFerriakasakaite-(La) and Ferriandrosite-(La)Ferro-pedriziteFlamiteFlinteiteFluorchegemiteFluor-tsilaisiteGatedaliteKononoviteMendigiteNabimusaite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This New Mineral Names has entries for 18 new minerals, including aradite, chlorkyuygenite, chubarovite, cryobostryxite, ferriakasakaite-(La), ferriandrosite-(La), ferro-pedrizite, flamite, flinteite, fluorchegemite, fluorkyuygenite, fluormayenite, fluor-tsilaisite, gatedalite, kononovite, mendigite, nabimusaite, and zadovite. # Aradite* and Zadovite* {#article-title-2} E.V. Galuskin, F. Gfeller, I.O. Galuskina, A. Pakhomova, T. Armbruster, Y. Vapnik, R. Wlodyka, P. Dzierzanowski, and M. Murashko (2015) New minerals with a modular structure derived from hatrurite from the pyrometamorphic Hatrurim Complex. Part II. Zadovite, BaCa6[(SiO4)(PO4)](PO4)2F and aradite, BaCa6[(SiO4)(VO4)](VO4)2F, from paralavas of the Hatrurim Basin, Negev Desert, Israel. Mineralogical Magazine, 79, 1073–1087. Two new minerals aradite (IMA 2013-047), ideally BaCa6[(SiO4) (VO4)](VO4)2F and zadovite (IMA 2013-031), ideally BaCa6[(SiO4)(PO4)] (PO4)2F, the members of the solid solution BaCa6[(SiO4),(PO4),(VO4)]4F, were discovered in a few centimeter thick paralava veins in gehlenite-rich pyrometamorphic rocks of the Hatrurim Complex, Gurim Anticline, Hatrurim Basin (31°12′N 35°14′E), located near the town of Arad in the Negev Desert, Israel. Aradite and zadovite are associated with rock-forming gehlenite, pseudowollastonite, wollastonite, andradite–schorlomite garnet-series, rankinite, magnesioferrite, kalsilite and fluorapatite; with minor P-rich ellestadite, larnite, cuspidine, and hematite. Accessory minerals are dorrite-khesinite, barioferrite, walstromite, barite, gurimite, fresnoite, delafossite, cuprite, vorlanite, perovskite, and hexacelsian. Zadovite and aradite are colorless, transparent with a white streak, have vitreous luster and uneven fracture. Both are uniaxial …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".