Effects of acute rejection on L-arginine/iNOS pathway in canine heart transplantation.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The inflammatory process resulting from ischemia-reperfusion and acute rejection is a strong modulator of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression of both constitutive and inducible isoforms. OBJECTIVE: To assess the expression of the endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase (ecNOS) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activity in conductance coronary arteries after reperfusion and acute rejection in the canine heart transplantation setting. METHODS: Expression of ecNOS and iNOS was evaluated in two groups of mongrel dogs (n=7) that underwent heterotopic heart transplantation without immunosuppression. The first group was studied after 24 h of reperfusion and the second after five days of acute untreated rejection. A third group (n=7) consisting of normal unoperated dogs was used as control. Functional vascular status of iNOS isoforms was studied in organ chambers, and tissue enzyme expression by histological and immunohistochemical studies. RESULTS: At harvest, vonWillebrand factor was present on the coronary endothelium of all groups. Both transplanted groups displayed iNOS and ecNOS expression by immunohistochemical study. The control group only displayed ecNOS expression. L-arginine induced endothelium-dependent relaxations in group 1 and group 2 but not in the control group. This was inhibited by the iNOS inhibitor aminoguanidine. Endothelium-independent contractility and relaxation were unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: In this experimental setting, a specific endothelial expression of iNOS was observed early on after acute rejection. The functional aspect of this endothelial iNOS expression was reversible with aminoguanidine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".