MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2470501196 · doi:10.1057/9780230622159_15

Documenting Urban Fictions in Contemporary Argentine Film: Notes on Pablo Trapero’s El bonaerense

2009· book-chapter· en· W2470501196 on OpenAlexaff
James Cisneros

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSign (mathematics)NarrativeCapital (architecture)HumanitiesCartographyCapital cityGlobal cityArtHistoryArt historyGeographyLiteratureVisual artsEconomic geographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Buenos Aires holds a privileged place in contemporary Argentine film. Its protagonists roam the city streets under the sign of discovery or survival, evoking the capital’s monumental past and the smooth spaces of a new global presence. These cityscapes are constitutive of narrative meaning, chronotopes that open sites where fortunes change and paths intersect, making accessible a city whose recent transformations have been sudden and remain indecipherable. The characters decode the city as they move across it, interpreting its signs as they search or wander, translating the urban landscape that conditions their possible movements and encounters. Films as different as Pablo Trapero’s El bonaerense (2002), Alejandro Agresti’s Buenos Aires viceversa (1996) and Daniel Burak’s Bar “El Chino” (2003) open historic and affective trajectories through urban space, attempting to figure out the city, to figure the city, to find a figure that will make Buenos Aires legible after the multiple physical and civic changes arising with neo-liberalism. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooksSame topicLatin American Literature StudiesFrench-language works237,207