Le socialisme coopératif ou la « Jérusalem terrestre » de la <i>League for Social Reconstruction</i>, 1932-1942
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En réaction à la crise économique des années 1930, des intellectuels canadiens militent activement pour l’établissement d’une société «meilleure». En janvier 1932 est créée une League for Social Reconstruction visant l’éradication des calamités du système capitaliste. En 1934, une seconde initiative réformiste s’incarne dans la Fellowship for a Christian Social Order. Si l’on n’a pas manqué de remarquer la proximité de ton et la parenté idéologique entre ces organisations, on ne les a jamais traitées de front. Cet article veut remédier à cette lacune. Grâce à l’analyse d’un thème récurrent, le covenant community, on s’aperçoit que ces efforts réformistes ne sont pas simplement complémentaires, mais qu’ils se sous-tendent les uns les autres parce qu’ils circonscrivent un même univers culturel de significations sociales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".