ESCALA MULTIDIMENSIONAL NA AVALIAÇÃO DA DOR E SINTOMAS DE IDOSOS EM CUIDADOS PALIATIVOS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivou-se avaliar a dor e sintomas associados em idosos com câncer em cuidados paliativos em domicílio. Estudo quantitativo de corte transversal, realizado com 33 idosos, no município de Foz do Iguaçu, estado do Paraná, no período de janeiro a maio de 2015, por meio do Edmonton Symptom Assessment System e analisados pela estatística descritiva. Os idosos tinham a idade prevalente na sexta década de vida (60 a 69 anos), em sua maioria mulheres, casadas, com câncer de mama, baixa renda e baixa escolaridade, e portadoras de outras doenças associadas ao câncer. Verificou-se que 90,1% dos pacientes referem dor moderada, em queimação, diária e contínua no local acometido pelo tumor. Os sintomas associados à dor foram ansiedade, cansaço, depressão e redução do bem-estar. Conclui-se que é necessária a readequação das medidas para controle da dor e sintomas e maior investimento de gestores em saúde para possibilitar melhor assistência paliativa em domicílio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".