MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2470580034

Application of chitosan in the treatment of wastewater from agricultural sources

2016· article· en· W2470580034 on OpenAlex
Terence Yep

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsWastewaterSewage treatmentChitosanAgricultureEnvironmental scienceBusinessWaste managementPulp and paper industryEnvironmental engineeringEngineeringGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern agricultural practices is dependent on fertilizers, rich in nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. However, not all of the nutrients are absorbed and are usually washed away into rivers and streams. These runoffs accumulate in downstream large water bodies and enhance the growth of algae and unwanted plants, which leads to eutrophication. The consequences of eutrophication are the degradation of water quality and destruction of the affected aquatic eco-system. This study primarily examines the efficacy of metal-complexed chitosan composites in the attenuation of phosphates at three field test sites. In addition to this, chitosan was also studied for its potential use in hydrogen sulfide removal and its application in biological treatment. Metal-chitosan composites used in conjunction with red sand proved most effective in the removal of phosphates reducing it from ~19 μg/ml by 6-30 fold. Furthermore, these composites were capable of attenuating dissolved hydrosulfides from 1mM by 100-fold.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.738

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it