Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il presente articolo s’incentra sul concetto d’identità canadese, tuttora in progress, data la complessa rete di elementi culturali che danno luogo a movimenti d’integrazione e di repulsione, di fusione e di giustapposizione, sempre parziali e negoziabili. Tra il multiculturalismo proposto dal Governo Federale e il meticciato avanzato dal Québec, s’inserisce un progetto ispano-canadese che poggia sulla costruzioni dell’archetipo di un mondo la cui natura epistemologica consiste nel considerare, per analogia, modello ciò che si discosta dalla realtà.Canada: Multicultural CrossingThe present essay focusses on the Canadian identity, a concept which is still in progress, given the complexity of cultural issues promoting operations of integration as well as of repulsion, of fusion as well as of juxtaposition, which indeed are always partial and negotiable. In between the concept of multiculturalism as proposed by the Federal Government and that of hybridism as proposed by Québec, there stands a Hispanic-Canadian project. Its stand-point is the construction of a world, whose epistemological nature lies in the fact that all that diverges from reality is analogically refererred to the archetype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".