MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2470591010 · doi:10.1134/s1022795412060087

Properties of the new D3-like Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteriophage phiPMG1: Genome structure and prospects for the use in phage therapy

2012· article· en· W2470591010 on OpenAlexaff
С. В. Крылов, Andrew M. Kropinski, Е. А. Плетенева, О. В. Шабурова, М В Буркальцева, K. A. Mirosnnikov, В. Н. Крылов

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Journal of Genetics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenomeBiologyBacteriophageHorizontal gene transferTemperatenessHomology (biology)GeneVirulenceGeneticsPlasmidPhage therapyPhagemidBacteriaBacterial genome sizePseudomonas aeruginosaMicrobiologyEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Results of studying the novel virulent phage phiPMG1 active on Pseudomonas aeruginosa are presented. phiPMG1 was shown to exhibit detectable homology and resemblance in the total genome structure with temperate converting phage D3. Phage phiPMG1 differs from D3 in that it fails to stably lysogenize bacteria and can grow on strains carrying plasmids that cause growth inhibition of phage D3 and some other phages. This significantly diminishes the probability of horizontal gene transfer with phage phiPMG1 and suggests the possible employment of this phage in phage therapy. A comparison of genome structures in phages phiPMG1 and D3 demonstrated not only high homology of 65 genes, but also the presence in the phiPMG1 genome of 16 genes that were not recorded in the files of NCBI database. Apparently, the evolution of genomes in phages of this species is mostly associated with migrations into other species of bacteria and recombinations with phages of other species (for example, F116). Detailed structural analysis a genome region in which the essential nonhomology is exhibited between three D3-like phages (D3, phiPMG1, and PAJU2) revealed that the phiPMG1 genome supposedly is phylogenetically closer than the others to the genome of a hypothetical ancestor phage belonging to this species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Journal of GeneticsSame topicBacteriophages and microbial interactionsFrench-language works237,207