MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2470644716

Rotary Club of Lincoln (Ontario) fonds, 1995-2014

2016· article· en· W2470644716 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chantal Cameron

Bibliographic record

VenueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClubCharterLaunchedManagementService (business)LawPolitical scienceMedia studiesSociologyEngineeringBusinessMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first Rotary Club was founded by Chicago attorney Paul Harris in 1905. It was one of the world’s first service organizations, consisting of a group of professionals with diverse backgrounds. The members would take turns hosting meetings in their offices, which is how the name Rotary was established. The organization quickly became international, with clubs on six continents 16 years after the founding of the first club. One of the most prolific and successful programs of Rotary International has been the fight to eradicate polio. The Rotary Club of Lincoln (Ontario) was established in 1997. The Club was launched with a Charter Night event on February 1, 1997, with 22 founding members. The Club has sponsored many community events and fundraisers over the years, including the Lamplighter Tour (live theatre performances focusing on local history); Stand by Me (a program that provides a venue for youth to learn and experience the organizations and activities available within the Town of Lincoln); and the Sunset Music Series in Charles Daley Park.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0160.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1050.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207