EFEK INTERAKSI KINERJA DAN SENSE OF HUMOR PENYULUH SOSIAL PADA PENINGKATAN PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DALAM PROGRAM KESEJAHTERAAN SOSIAL DI INDONESIA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh kinerja, sense of humor, dan interaksi antara kinerja dan sense of humor penyuluh sosial pada partisipasi masyarakat dalam program pembangunan kesejahteraan sosial di Indonesia. Penelilitian ini menggunakan metode survey kuantitatif dan melibatkan 124 penyuluh sosial sebagai responden yang tersebar di beberapa provinsi di Indonesia. Instrumen pengumpulan data menggunakan kuisioner kinerja penyuluh sosial, multidimensional sense of humor, dan partisipasi masyarakat. Analisis data menggunakan Moderating Structural Equation Modeling (MSEM). Hasil penelitian menemukan pengaruh positif interaksi kinerja dan sense of humor penyuluh sosial pada peningkatan partisipasi masyarakat dalam program kesejahteraan sosial di Indonesia. Penelitian ini juga menemukan pengaruh positif kinerja penyuluh sosial pada partisipasi masyarakat, pengaruh positif sikap terhadap humor pada penggunaan humor coping, pengaruh positif pengembangan kualitas penyuluhan pada partisipasi masyarakat dalam perencanaan program
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it