MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2470811954 · doi:10.2138/am-2002-0724

Surface reconstruction and As-polymerization at fractured loellingite (FeAs <sub>2</sub> ) surfaces

2002· article· en· W2470811954 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicIron-based superconductors research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersDivision of Materials ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyPolymerizationSynchrotron radiationFracture (geology)Surface (topology)Materials scienceBond cleavageSynchrotronSurface reconstructionCrystallographyX-rayChemistryChemical physicsComposite materialChemical engineeringPolymerGeometryCatalysisOrganic chemistryOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synchrotron Radiation X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (SRXPS) and conventional X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) of pristine (unreacted) loellingite fracture surfaces reveal two distinct contributions to the As 3d spectrum. One is derived from As atoms of the bulk phase (fully coordinated As atoms) and the other is derived from polymeric As species located on fracture surfaces. Surface polymerization reactions probably proceed in response to fracture whereby As dimers at the surface react to produce surface tetramers and possibly surface heptamers. Trimeric and pentameric species may form where As-As bond scission occurs during fracture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it