Targeted Gene Transfer: A Practical Guide Based on Experience with Lipid-Based Plasmid Delivery Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The overall goal of gene therapy is to cure or stabilize a disease process that results from the production of a mutant protein (for example, the chloride channel protein important in cystic fibrosis) or overproduction of a normal protein (such as the products of certain oncogenes). We can achieve this goal by replacing the defective gene or by reducing the overexpression of the target gene using an antisense strategy, thus reducing the production of the diseasepromoting protein (1,2). For either method, it is critical to transfer DNA into target cells in a concentration high enough to be effective in modifying the disease. DNA must be delivered to the desired cell population in an intact state, whereby it can be efficiently transcribed and ultimately translated. The method of gene transfer must be highly efficient and nontoxic, and the delivery system must be relatively easy to prepare and administer (3). There is a great deal of optimism surrounding the development of gene therapy as an effective strategy for management of many different human diseases. The active agent used to procure gene therapy is likely to consist of oligonucleotides, ribozymes, or a DNA sequence that can be transcribed into a message capable of eliciting a therapeutic response. Unlike conventional small-molecule therapeutics however, gene therapy requires the use of a carrier system to deliver the active agent directly into the target cell population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".